Thursday, December 26, 2019
The Yellow Wallpaper Essay Importance Of Identity And...
The Importance of Identity and Self Expression in The Yellow Wallpaper In the article â€Å"‘Too Terribly Good to Be Printed’: Charlotte Gilman’s ‘The Yellow Wallpaper,’†Conrad Shumaker explains the genius of â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper†and how its themes reflect the patriarchal society of the time period. Shumaker identifies one theme as the detriment of suppressing the narrator’s sense of self and that â€Å"by trying to ignore and repress her imagination, in short, John eventually brings about the very circumstance he wants to prevent†(590). John confines his wife in a yellow â€Å"nursery†in order to â€Å"cure†her of her illness, banning her from writing and discouraging her imagination. His plan backfires when her mind, unable to find a proper outlet, latches onto the yellow wallpaper that eventually drives her to madness. Another theme that Shumaker points out is that the dynamic of a domineering husband and an obedient wife is a cage that the narrator is desperately t rying to free herself from. John constantly dismisses the narrator’s opinions and thoughts and insists that he knows what is best for her. Shumaker points out that the husband, a representation of the patriarchal society, is clearly depicted as the villain and that he â€Å"attempts to ‘cure’ her through purely physical means, only to find he has destroyed her in the process†(592). At the end of the story, because of her confinement and inability to express herself, the narrator fully descends into insanity, â€Å"escaping†theShow MoreRelatedThe Yellow Wallpaper, By Charlotte Perkins Gilman Essay1687 Words  | 7 PagesImmediately in Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s story â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper,†readers are able to tell that the protagonist feels trapped in the room, in which she is being placed. The female narrator also mentions to us that her husband â€Å"John is a physician, and perhaps –– (I would not say it to a living soul, of course, but this is dead paper and a great relief to my mind –– perhaps that is one reason I do not get well faster†(Stetson 1892, 129). That is to say, this statement clearly indicates thatRead MoreCharlotte Perkins Gilman’s â€Å"the Yellow Wallpaper†: the Use of Symbolism to Express the Psychological, Sexual, and Creative Oppression Experienced by Women in the Twentieth Century3480 Words  | 14 PagesAmber Gonzalez 12/6/11 English 2213 Melissa Whitney Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper†: The Use of Symbolism to Express The Psychological, Sexual, and Creative Oppression Experienced by Women In The Twentieth Century Charlotte Perkins Gilman wrote â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper†in the late 1800’s while being treating by the very trusted Weir Mitchell. During this time women were commonly admitted into the care of doctors by their husbands without their given consent. At this timeRead More The Awakening and The Yellow Wallpaper2395 Words  | 10 PagesThe Yellow Wallpaper draw their power from two truths: First, each work stands as a political cry against injustice and at the socio/political genesis of the modern feminist movement. Second, each text is a gatekeeper of a new literary history. Kate Chopin and Charlotte Perkins Gilman seem to initiate a new phase in textual history where literary conventions are revised to serve an ideology representative of the new feminine presence. Two conventions in particular seem of central importance: marriageRead MoreEssay about Summary of History of Graphic Design by Meggs14945 Words  | 60 Pagesinvention, is attributed with the high gove rnment official Ts’ai Lun. - Ts’ai Lun’s method of making paper was unchanged until nineteenth century England. - After the invention of paper, the Chinese also began to use it for wrapping presents, wallpaper, napkins and toilet paper. - Printing was invented by the Chinese. - The first method of printing was block printing, using stamps. - Rubbings were also made by carving words into stone, then inking the stone and making a print on a piece ofRead MoreANALIZ TEXT INTERPRETATION AND ANALYSIS28843 Words  | 116 Pagesmomentum that drives the plot forward its appointed resolution. Chronological plot structure can be loose, relaxed and episodic. In Henry Fielding’s Tom Jones and Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn, the plots are composed of a series of separate and largely self-contained episodes, resembling so many beads on a string. The unifying element is the protagonist, as he wanders into and out of a series of adventures that, in their totality, initiate him to life and provide his moral education. A third type ofRead MoreProject Mgmt296381 Words  | 1186 Pagesthe cause-effect relationships and interactions among the sociotechnical dimensions of projects. Improved competency in these dimensions will greatly enhance your competitive edge as a project manager. The field of project management is growing in importance and at an exponential rate. It is nearly impossible to imagine a future management career that does not include management of projects. Rà ©sumà ©s of managers will soon be primarily a description of the individual’s participation in and contributions
Wednesday, December 18, 2019
Descartes - Meditations Essay - 1649 Words
In the Meditations, Rene Descartes attempts to doubt everything that is possible to doubt. His uncertainty of things that existence ranges from God to himself. Then he goes on to start proving that things do exist by first proving that he exists. After he establishes himself he can go on to establish everything else in the world. Next he goes to prove that the mind is separate then the body. In order to do this he must first prove he has a mind, and then prove that bodily things exist. I do agree with Descartes that the mind is separate from the body. These are the arguments that I agree with Descartes. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;In his six Meditations, only four contain his argument about corporeal things and establishing himself as a†¦show more content†¦Since he can only be certain of the existence of himself insofar as he is a thinking thing, then he has knowledge of his existence of only a thinking thing. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;After he has established himself as a thinking thing, he then goes on to argue that the mind is more certainly known then the body. He goes on to say that it is possible that all knowledge of external objects, including his body, could be false as the result of the actions of an evil demon. It is not, however, possible that he could be deceived about his existence or his nature as a thinking thing. This is true because if he can be deceived about anything, then he can be certain, as he is a thinking thing. Even corporeal objects, such as his body, are known much more distinctly through the mind than through the body. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;This is where the wax argument comes into play. All the properties of the piece of wax that we perceive with the senses change as the wax melts. This is true as well of its primary properties, such as shape, extension and size. Yet the wax remains the same piece of wax as it melts. We know the wax through our mind and judgement, not through our senses or imagination. Therefore, every act of clear and distinct knowledge of corporeal matter also provides even more certain evidence for the existence of Descartes as a thinking thing. Therefore his mind is much clearer and more distinctly know to him than his body. At thisShow MoreRelated The Meditations by Rene Descartes1003 Words  | 5 PagesIn Descartes’ Meditations, his goal to prove the existence of things could only be accomplished if he was logical, clear, and correct in his thoughts and writings. The most important issues he noted were the threat of being deceived and the potential of being inco rrect in his judgments, both of which would lead him into error. Error exists as a problem that individuals encounter on a regular basis, and it also exists as a focal point in Descartes’ Meditations. Descartes defines error as â€Å"a privationRead MoreEssay on Descartes Meditations1018 Words  | 5 PagesDescartes Meditations Descartes meditations are created in pursuit of certainty, or true knowledge. He cannot assume that what he has learned is necessarily true, because he is unsure of the accuracy of its initial source. In order to purge himself of all information that is possibly wrong, he subjects his knowledge to methodic doubt. This results in a (theoretical) doubt of everything he knows. Anything, he reasons, that can sustain such serious doubt must be unquestionable truth, andRead More Descartes Meditations Essay2147 Words  | 9 PagesDescartes Meditations In Descartes’ meditations, Descartes begins what Bernard Williams has called the project of ‘pure enquiry’ to discover an indubitable premise or foundation to base his knowledge on, by subjecting everything to a kind of scepticism now known as Cartesian doubt. This is known as foundationalism, where a philosopher basis all epistemological knowledge on an indubitable premise. Within meditation one Descartes subjects all of his beliefs regarding sensory data and evenRead MoreEssay on Descartes Meditations1153 Words  | 5 PagesDescartes Meditations The way Descartes chose to write this piece literature captivated me. Descartes was a very intelligent man who wanted to make sense of the world he lived in. The format he used was unusual. It seems to me that he may have used this format, which is a replication of the book of Genesis in the Bible, to have a deeper and more profound impact on the reader. There are many similarities between Descartes Meditations and the first book of the Bible, Genesis. ForRead MoreEssay on Descartes - Meditations1640 Words  | 7 PagesIn the Meditations, Rene Descartes attempts to doubt everything that is possible to doubt. His uncertainty of things that existence ranges from God to himself. Then he goes on to start proving that things do exist by first proving that he exists. After he establishes himself he can go on to establish everything else in the world. Next he goes to prove that the mind is separate then the body. In order to do this he must first prove he has a mind, and t hen prove that bodily things exist. I doRead MoreDescartes Meditations On First Philosophy1961 Words  | 8 PagesIn Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, I will be considering if Descartes resolution to the â€Å"dreaming argument†seems acceptable to trust. The First Meditation is where the â€Å"dreaming argument†is first mentioned and then gets resolved later in the Sixth Meditation and the Objections and Replies. I will be touching on the idea that our experiences could be dreaming experiences based on personal experiences and thoughts I have had regarding this topic. Then I will go on to explain how it isRead MoreThe Philosophy Of Descartes Meditations1698 Words  | 7 PagesDescartes Meditations is said to be the beginning of Western Philosophy. His writings are still greatly referred to to this day, and he is most famous for his quote â€Å"cogito ergo sum†which translates to â€Å"I think, therefore I am.†Each of Descarte s’ meditations are followed by objections from other theologists and philosophers, and thereon followed by replies from Descartes. Some objections are made stronger than others, for example, Thomas Hobbes, and it could be doubted whether or not DescartesRead MoreThe Meditations By Rene Descartes1384 Words  | 6 PagesRenà © Descartes main goal in the Meditations is to establish that one exists and that a perfect God exists. However, he first argues that the idea that everything perceived around one could be false because the senses are sometimes deceiving. In the first Meditation, Descartes introduces skepticism and brings forth a method of doubt in which he evaluates his beliefs, and questions whether they are true or false and why they should be doubted. He presents various hypothesis that prove there is reasonRead MoreDescartes Meditations Of First Philosophy857 Words  | 4 PagesChristopher Joao Philosophy- 201 Mr. Jurkiewicz 4 March 2016 Descartes’ - Meditation #2 Rene Descartes was a French philosopher born in 1596. He is considered by many the father of modern philosophy and continues to have tremendous influence in the philosophical world to this day. The book, Meditations of First Philosophy, consist of six meditations and describes one meditation per day for six days. In meditation two, he claims that we have better knowledge of our own minds than of the physicalRead MoreAnalysis Of Descartes s The Meditations Essay1580 Words  | 7 PagesThroughout the Meditations, Descartes successfully establishes methodical doubt about math and all sensory information, however, his answer to the doubt cast by the Evil Demon ploy does not fully relieve the dilemma of skepticism that his intense application of doubt has brought forth. Ultimately, Descartes is unable to satisfactorily answer the Evil Demon doubt because his argument does not prove that God’s existence would not prevent the serious errors in judgment and perception caused by t he Evil
Tuesday, December 10, 2019
The way in which Shakespeare dramatizes the prejudices of his own society in the court scene of The Merchant of Venice Essay Example For Students
The way in which Shakespeare dramatizes the prejudices of his own society in the court scene of The Merchant of Venice Essay In this essay the theme of prejudice will be carefully analysed, by focusing on Act 4 scene 1 of The Merchant of Venice, or as it is also known as the court scene. Though this play is a Romantic Comedy it also highlights the darker sides of human nature: greed, prejudice, hatred and deception. Prejudice was typical of Elizabethan culture, especially anti-Semitism, the hatred of Jews. This is well shown in the play as the stereotypical twisted and evil bad guy is in fact a Jew himself! In the court the judge, the god like figure is the Duke of Venice. Though he has a lot of power and respect he is as biased as anyone else towards Antonio, the accused in this case: I am sorry for thee: thou art come to answer A stony adversary, Not only is he biased towards Antonio as he sees Shylock as stony and cold like a rock, or perhaps he sees his heart as stony, unable of feel pity or remorse. Furthermore he feels pity for Antonio and that pity would definitely lean the case in favour of Antonio in the Dukes point of view. Shylock chooses to take Antonios life rather than have three thousand ducats, which would not only make him a merciless wretch but also put him against the stereotypical Jewish money loving man. Shakespeares design of this character shows the prejudices of Elizabethan society: Carrion-flesh than receive Three thousand Ducats: Ill not answer that: But say, it is my humour This says not only that she would rather take the carrion or useless flesh than the money but also that this dire order is his humour! In other words, Shakespeare is saying that Shylock would find Antonios pain and suffering amusing or even funny! It is also ambiguous as your humour is just part of your personality and cannot be changed, just like Shylocks decision to take the flesh instead of the money. Furthermore, Shylock is fully aware of the prejudices of Venetian society as he highlights these in his What judgement shall I dread? speech: Let them be free, marry them to your heirs? In this speech he talks about the slaves. Slaves and servants were the lowest, poorest class you could be. The people from higher classes in society did not mix and definitely did not marry people lower than them no matter what kind of a person they were, but the bigger picture is that the whole idea of class, and rich and poor people is one of the worst prejudices in the societies of the world. Also this may be ambiguous, as Shylock could be suggesting that they bought the slaves the same as he bought Antonios flesh and they would not give up their slaves, so why should Shylock give up his flesh? At another moment in the play Antonios speeches show bravery but also prejudice when he cannot see any goodness in Shylocks blackened heart and has given up all hope for his life: You may as well go stand upon the beach, And bid the main flood bate his usual height; This is comparing Shylock to the tides of the sea, and that telling Shylock to be merciful or not to take the flesh is as pointless as telling the tides not to ebb and flow. This is prejudice, as he is assuming that Shylock has no pity or remorse left in his heart and no matter what they say, no matter how much they cry their hearts out he will never change. They could never stop his spiteful resolution. Also Antonio emits a line that reflects the previous point as well as highlighting his heroism and his friendship with Bassanio: Absolon in Chaucer's The Miller's tale EssayBut life itself, my wife, and all the world Are not with me esteemd above thy life: Here Bassanio says that anything and everything is below Antonios life and that he would give his wife, who ironically got them into this situation in the first place, then have Shylock take his bond and Antonio to die. This emphasizes the position of women in Elizabethan society, as Bassanio says that his wifes life is below the one of his friend. Though prejudice is being slung at Shylock from all directions he still manages to highlight his own views of Christians: I have a daughter; Would any of the stock of Barrabas Had been her husband rather than a Christian! Earlier in the play Shylocks daughter ran off to marry one of Antonios Christian friends, Lorenzo. Shylock is mad about this as he says in this comment. He would rather she marry someone like Barrabas, (an evil, murdering thief from the New Testament, who was chosen by the people of Jerusalem to be freed instead of Jesus at the Passover Festival), instead of Lorenzo purely because he is a Christian. Though this would shock the audience, was it not the other Christians in the court who were doing the same to Shylock? Therefore Shakespeare is saying that the Jews dont change, they would still choose a person like Barrabas, regardless of what they are like, than a Christian like Jesus. Ambiguously the mention of Barrabas, a Jew himself, highlights the fact that they think that all Jew are spiteful and horrible. Portia turns the tables on Shylocks, what seem to be unbreakable plan, by saying that he can only have flesh not blood: But in cutting it, if thou dost shed One drop of Christian blood, thy land and goods Are, by the laws of Venice, Confiscate If Shylock spills a single drop of Antonios blood he will therefore be breaking the law and will receive the punishment for this crime. Portias line: One drop of Christian blood is prejudiced against Shylock as she suggests that if he was to cut a Jewish person in the same way, Shylock would spill only Jewish blood and that would not be as bad as to spill a drop of Christian blood. Therefore this suggests that a Jews life is worthless compared to a Christian life. Consequently Shylock cannot kill Antonio and has been beaten. Although Shylock does not go home empty handed, his life is then put in the mercy of Antonio for intending to take a life, but the Duke and Antonio are both lenient towards Shylock as Antonio says: , That for this favour, He presently becomes a Christian; The fact that the Christians are put across as much more forgiving and merciful than Shylock, emphases the stereotypical views of Christians and Jews which is prejudicial in itself. Also that they are giving Shylock mercy when he could not give it to them, lowers Shylocks character even more. Most of all the fact that he is made to relinquish his religious beliefs, probably the most important aspect of his life, highlights that he loves life more than his god. Also for him to then convert to Christianity, gives the suggestion that he is being reformed and that changing his religion will change his horrible characteristics. Overall I believe Shakespeare dramatises the prejudices in the play well. He makes this obvious enough to be spotted and perhaps enabling him to portray his views to the ignorant spectators. However he does this in such a way as not to make his comments too overt as to offend and insult his extremely prejudicial 17th Century audience.
Monday, December 2, 2019
Speech of Tribute (Outline) †Christiaan Barnard Essay Example
Speech of Tribute (Outline) – Christiaan Barnard Essay Introduction (herby introducing the salient points I am going to discuss in this speech)1.                 With the fast pace of today’s life and the increased amounts of saturated fats and other unhealthy substances we consume, the rate of heart disease is high, and one day all of our hearts, including yours, may give out.2.                 If this does happen, you don’t have to be as concerned as people whose hearts gave in before the days of the first heart transplant, by South African Doctor Christiaan Barnard were.3.                 First we are going to look at what led him up to this pioneering surgery, secondly the surgery itself and thirdly the implications this has had for the later world.Transition. (moving onto the body of the speech)4.                 F irst, let’s discuss the background of the man, described by ex-South African President Nelson Mandela as one of South Africa’s main achievers (BBC News 2001) who made this marked contribution to medicine.5.                 Barnard was the son of a clergyman, born on 8 November 1922. (Answers.com 2006).6.                 He grew up in a small town in the Karoo semi desert region of South Africa (BBC News 2001)7.                 From these humble beginnings he went on to study medicine first at the University of Cape Town and then the University of Minneapolis, where he switched from general surgery to cardiology and heart-lung surgery (BBC News 2001).8.                 On 3 December 1967 at Cape Town’s Groote Schuur Hospital, Dr Barnard and his team carried o ut the world’s first heart transplant. (Holmes and Chapman, 2001)9.                 The patient was Louis Washkansky had only two days left to live when he received his donor heart from a 25 year old woman who had died in a car accident. (Holmes and Chapman, 2001)10.             Although Washkansky survived only 18 days after the operation (death was because his body had rejected the new heart), the pioneering surgery was hailed a success and Barnard achieved great fame, although this had not been his aim at the time of the operation (Holmes and Chapman, 2001)11.             The operation was made more remarkable by the fact that it was achieved in South Africa by a South African from a small town, as opposed to a surgeon from a much larger country.12.             The operation did not only spark awe and ac claim, but also concern and criticism as some felt it was done too early, and was experimental. Barnard himself said, after the death of his patient â€Å"I wouldn’t like to call this operation an experiment – it was the treatment of a sick patient. Although Washkansky died, I don’t think we have any evidence that transplantation is not good treatment for certain heart diseases†(Swazey and Fox, 2004)13.             Indeed, today there is positive evidence that transplantation IS good treatment for heart diseases:  Approximately 1,600 heart transplants are performed each year in the United States. (Miller, 1996)14.             Within a very short space of time a number of American surgeons including Adrian Kantrowitz and Norman Shumway also performed transplants. In 1968 108 transplants were performed, and in November of that year alone, 26. (Rothman, 1991)15.             Francis Moore, who was a professor of surgery at Harvard and at Peter Bent Brigham Hospital and author of a book about the ethics of kidney transplants, â€Å"Give and Take†immediately recognized the implications of heart transplants for medical ethics, including the true definition of death, (Rothman, 1991).16.             In heart transplantation it is urgently necessary that the donated heart be as fresh as possible, and therefore the question is raised as to who decides whether or not the donor is dead. (Jecker, 1997)17.             Nevertheless the pioneering surgery has paved the way for many advances in the field. Since 1981, combined heart and lung transplants have been used to treat patients with conditions that severely damage both these organs. As of 1990, about 800 people worldwide have received heart/lung transplants. (Miller , 1996)18.             In 1983, a major barrier to the success of transplantation- rejection of the donor organ by the patient-was overcome. The drug cyclosporine was introduced to suppress rejection of a donor heart or heart/lung by the patients body. Research is under way to develop even better ways to control transplant rejection and improve survival. (Miller, 1996)19.             Today 95% of patients who undergo heart transplant operations survive their first year, and over 50% survive for ten years or more (Holmes and Chapman, 2001)Transition (moving onto the conclusion)17.     In conclusion, pioneering work done by Dr Christiaan Barnard in 1967 has given hope to many suffering from heart disease the world over.Conclusion (recapping what I have discussed in this speech)19               Christiaan Barnard was a South African from a sm all town who researched and performed pioneering work, the first successful heart transplant.20               Although the work was considered by some to be experimental and too early, and the patient survived just 18 days, much was learned and today because of knowledge gained during this procedure and further research done, the survival rate of these patients is much higher.21               Dr Christiaan Barnard died on 2 September 2001, at the age of 78, while on holiday in Cyprus with his family (BBC News, 2001).ReferencesAnswers.com 2006 â€Å"Dr Christiaan Barnard†retrieved 6 August 2006 from the website http://www.answers.com/topic/dr-christiaan-barnardBBC News â€Å"Pioneering Heart Surgeon Dies†2001, retrieved 6 August 2006 from the website http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1521649.stmHolmes and Chapman, 2001 â€Å"Eureka!†Heinemann Educational PublishersJecke r, 1997, â€Å"Bioethics: An Introduction to the History, Methods and Practice†, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, IncRothman, 1991 â€Å"Strangers at the Bedside†1991Swazey and Fox, 2004, â€Å"The Courage to Fail†Transaction Publishers;
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)